Skip to main content

CORRECTED - Factbox - Apple, Amazon, Google and tax avoidance schemes


European leaders meet on Wednesday to discuss tax policy and specifically their concerns over how a number of high-profile international companies have managed to pay next to no tax on their vast sales revenue generated in Europe.
Following is a summary of several recent cases and links to the Reuters stories on each one.
APPLE INC.
An investigation by the U.S. Senate showed this week that the maker of iPads and iPhones had paid just 2 percent tax on income of $74 billion over the past three years, largely by exploiting an unusual loophole in Ireland's tax code.
Ireland has said it is not to blame, and Apple has defended its practices, which are legal. But the Senate report has added to the furore surrounding tax avoidance by major companies.
GOOGLE INC.
Despite generating $18 billion of revenue in Britain from 2006 to 2011, the Internet search giant paid only $16 million in taxes to British authorities. Google says it does not have a sales presence in Britain and therefore cannot be considered resident for tax purposes, lowering its obligations.
An investigation by Reuters has shown that some of the 1,300 people employed by Google UK Ltd are engaged in sales-type work or have titles that suggest involvement in sales and marketing activities, but Google says it hires people with a sales background even if they are not directly involved in selling.
The British parliament has called Google executives before a hearing to try to understand more about its activities.
STARBUCKS CORP.
Starbucks came under criticism last year after Reuters revealed that the coffee chain paid only 8.6 million pounds in taxes on 13.1 billion of revenues since 2000.
Starbucks has said it is down to where the company books its profits. Accounts filed for its British, German and French units, which make up 90 percent of European revenues, show a loss of $60 million in 2011, hence very little tax.
However, Starbucks told investors that its European business were actually profitable, making $40 million in 2011. The gap is all down to clever tax planning and exploiting loopholes.
AMAZON.COM INC.
The Internet retail company runs the bulk of its European operations out of Luxembourg, allowing it to minimize the amount of tax it has to be pay on revenue generated in other European countries.
But the tax avoidance mechanism has also allowed Amazon to dramatically cut its U.S. tax bill, an investigation by Reuters has shown, with the company paying a tax rate of around 5.3 percent over the past 5 years. The U.S. tax authorities have asked Amazon to pay back taxes totalling $1.5 billion, a demand that the company has said it will "vigorously contest".
VODAFONE GROUP PLC
The world's largest mobile phone operator has managed to gradually reduce the amount of tax it pays in Britain over the past decade by using legal tax avoidance schemes, including registering profit in other jurisdictions, such as Luxembourg.
A Reuters examination of statutory filings by Vodafone across Europe over the past 16 years shows that the British taxman has frequently gone empty handed, losing out on perhaps has much as 1 billion pounds in revenue.
Vodafone cuts tax bill by up to $1.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's first 100% indigenously invented green E-Rickshaw launched

In a bet to enhance the Indian e-automobile marketplace, India’s first 100% indigenously created in addition to created e-automobiles (named E-Raaja) have already been released. The ICAT-authorized ten e-vehicles, including individual and industrial vehicles, were released lately. Such initiatives can help within the combat air pollution in large towns for example Mumbai and Delhi and provide a fillip to inexperienced company. The developments augur for reducing carbon impact and treating climate change. "consistent with the perspective of the 100% of the federal government e-flexibility by 2030, we've released numerous-utilisation e-automobiles. Although our e-automobiles is likely to be in May, start of e-two in marketplace - time will be taken by wheelers and you will be released after government acceptance," said India Managing Director Rajan Handa of okay the organisation production the models, Play. The e-automobiles contain e-rickshaws, e- shops, e-...

Priyanka Chopra's starry tantrums!

Priyanka Chopra, who is playing the role of Olympic champ Mary Kom in her next, is training hard to fit in the character. According to recent reports, the actress wants to install a punching bag near her home, but not inside it as she does not want to spoil the interiors of her house.  Priyanka Chopra and her family owns few flats in Raj Classic located at Versove. She wants to install a punching bag at the premises of the society, but it seems that her neighbours are not too happy with the decision. Talking about it, a source told a leading daily, "She owns quite a few flats in the building. It appears that she does not want to tamper with the ceiling in any of her homes in the building." The source further added, "As she is busy with her commitments, her father Ashok Chopra has been coordinating with the society folks to install it on the ground floor of the premises." Well PeeCee, instead of your training, we would like you to focus more on your acting!

Jennifer Lawrence's Makeup-Free Look Was a Big Mistake

ll right. I'm gonna be brutally honest, here. After seeing Jennifer Lawrence's barely there makeup at the premiere of The Great Gatsby -- I really think choosing to go so light on the eyeliner and eye shadow this time around was a bad idea. Yes, I know she's young and fresh-faced and has a natural vibe going on and doesn't need a whole lot of makeup to look good. But in this case, especially given the formality of the event, she probably should've gone a bit heavier on the cosmetics. And I'll tell you why. Jen is gorgeous, but she also has a baby-faced appearance, so when she doesn't play up her eyes, she looks much younger than she actually is. Granted, for 30- and 40-somethings, this is generally a good thing. But in her case, at 22, she actually looks more like 15 when she chooses to go the minimal makeup (or makeup-free) route. She looks so much less sophisticated -- like she really didn't put any sort of effort in at all. Here's a photo of the...